- Hottness: Self-explanatory; often linked to my favorite TV or movie portrayal of the character
- Likeability: If that character existed today and asked me out, Likeability measures how attractive I would find their personality and behavior.
- Byronicness: How Byronic are they?
- Woobieness: A woobie is a character that is tragic and sympathetic because of outside circumstances. I made this list a few months ago and many of my favorite characters were quite low because they weren't Byronic. This statistic allows non-antiheroes a chance to rank higher. If their Woobieness is established by a Dark and Troubled Past, though, then it also contributes to their Byronicness.
- Books: The Lord of the Rings series by J.R.R. Tolkien
- Hottness: 8
- Likeability: 7
- Byronicness: 0
- Woobieness: 10
- Total: 16
Portrayal: Orlando Bloom in the films. This was the role that put Orly at the top of my Ten Hottest Guys List for many years. Unfortunately, not even brunette Will Turner could keep him from being demoted to fourth as I grew out my fad.
- Book: Hamlet by William Shakespeare
- Hottness: 4
- Likeability: 4
- Byronicness: 7
- Woobieness: 10
- Total: 25
Portrayal: Laurence Olivier is the golden standard when it comes to anything Shakespeare. He is very attractive with his head of gorgeous dark hair . . . wait! He DYED it?! Why?! If he played Hamlet as a brunette, he would’ve scored a 9 in Hotness. But he didn’t, and it’s too bad for him.
18. Caspian X
- Books: The Chronicles of Narnia series by C.S. Lewis
- Hottness: 10
- Likeability: 8
- Byronicness: 3
- Woobieness: 6
- Total: 27
Because of that, Caspian was deducted points in Likeability for being too perfectly flawless. In my world antiheroes fare much better in that category because they’re more lifelike. He also benefited from the new Woobieness statistic since he is only minimally Byronic. Any points he earned in the latter came from the former’s Dark and Troubled Past.
Portrayal: There were many inconsistencies between the newest Prince Caspian movie and the book, and only one I liked. In the book Caspian is a blonde; in the movie the director had the good sense to make him a brunette. That, in addition to Ben Barnes’s natural good looks, positively affected his Hotness score. Barnes’s accent could enter into Narm land sometimes, but overall his performance embodied Caspian’s character very well. Fortunately the accent was dropped in the third movie.
17. F'lar
- Books: The Dragonriders of Pern series by Anne McCaffrey
- Hottness: 10
- Likeability: 10
- Byronicness: 3
- Woobieness: 4
- Total: 27
Maybe I like F’lar so much because I resemble his wife, Lessa, quite a bit. Both of us have frizzy, uncontrollable hair, a petite build, and strong will. The only difference between us is a) location, and b) hair color. She has gorgeous pitch black tresses.
Portrayal: There is a Dragonflight movie in the making, but it’s been in Development Hell for years and doesn’t look like it will be made anytime soon. The photo above is from officially released Dragonriders of Pern merchandise and summarizes my vision of F’lar very well. I think Eric Bana looks right for the part, with Christina Ricci as Lessa and Orlando Bloom as F’nor, F’lar’s half-brother.
16. John Brook
- Books: Little Women and Little Men by Louisa May Alcott
- Hottness: 10
- Likeability: 10
- Byronicness: 2
- Woobieness: 5
- Total: 27
If I made this list when I was eleven John Brooke would’ve topped it. I always loved his grave, stoic demeanor and kuudere temperament. It’s my goal to marry a guy like him in real life, making him the most Likeable character on this list. In literary characters, though, I want someone a bit more flawed. His woobie backstory gave him a few Woobieness points and two generous Byronicness ones. His tragic death in Little Men raised his Woobieness score even more. When I read the book at age ten I thought he was the hottest character in it. And for my discussion of that . . .
Portrayal: I’ve yet to see anyone portray him the way I’ve always imagined, but Cliff Potts in the 1978 movie came the closest. His acting was spot-on and he had the right coloring, but it wouldn’t hurt to lose the round face, dimples and gain a few inches of height. At least that version had the “Aunt March Settles the Question” scene, unlike some versions . . . Speaking of that, whoever cast the redhaired, underdeveloped, stuttering nerd shown above in the 1994 production deserves to be shot. No, that’s too benevolent. It (and such a person is an it) needs to suffer the hom-dai along with Imhotep from the Mummy movies. Only then can it possibly atone for its horrible casting decision. Despite its good points (i.e. Winona Ryder and Christian Bale), I cannot see the 1994 production because watching “John Brooke” is like being stabbed in the stomach repeatedly with a dull kitchen knife. Being gang raped and murdered in a dark alley is less painful. It’s like seeing a childhood dream and adult ideal break like a glass castle in the air around you. The broken pieces fly into your skin and dig into your heart as it cries out for mercy that the movie will not deliver.
Next Topic: Twenty Literary Characters I Would Date, Part II (#15-11)Listening To: "Dominion" by the Sisters of Mercy
Reading: Still struggling through Paradise Lost. I think I might give up on it and start rereading Dracula.